Hadith Scholars' Perception of Narratives Who Are Assessed as Sakat?' Anhu and F?hi Na?ar by Imam Al-Bukhari

Abstract

The aim of this research is how hadith scholars perceive the narrators who are assessed as Sakat? 'anhu and F?hi Na?ar by Imam al-Bukhari in the book Tarikh al-Kabir. There are 81 fihi nazar labels while there are 9 narrators in Sakat? 'anhu. The author limited his research to 3 narrators in f?hi na?ar and 3 in Sakat? ‘anhu. The author limits it to only six narrators based on the areas where they live, namely Hadramaut, Kuffah, and Bukhara. The author's aim in this research is to find out the response of hadith scholars to the narrator who was assessed as Sakat? 'anhu and f?hi na?ar by Imam al-Bukhari. This research uses qualitative research, with library research for this descriptive research approach. The results of the author's research assess that the narrator sometimes has jarh, sometimes has ta'dil in the narrator. Imam al-Bukhari labeled hadith scholars with f?hi na?ar (they are still considering) and Sakat? 'anhu (they are silent) in the book Tarikh al-Kabir. The author also found that among the 6 narrators above, Imam al-Bukhari also took part in narrating the hadith to the narrators which he labeled with the label f?hi na?ar. Imam al-Bukhari gave the label f?hi na?ar to the narrator Salih bin Hayyan, but Imam al-Bukhari also participated in the sanad line, in which there was a narrator who he labeled with f?hi na?ar. Hadith scholars in assessing narrators who are labeled f?hi na?ar and Sakat? 'anhu vary, some say the narrators are laisa bi dzaka, laisa bi tsiqoh, matruk, munkarul hadith, yakdzibu, tsiqoh, sheikh and others.